Option 1
Zig M1 (2.61GH/s)
Option 2
X4 BRICK (65MH/s)
X4 BRICK (65MH/s) leads this comparison
X4 BRICK (65MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Dayun | Jasminer | Contextual |
| Model | Zig | X4 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 2.61 GH/s Best | 65 MH/s | Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 784W | 30W Best | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 300.27 J/GH | 0.46 J/MH Best | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 18.8 kWh | 0.7 kWh Best | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.98 | -$0.01 Best | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$29.55 | -$0.40 Best | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 140 x 300 x 170 mm | 257 x 200 x 100 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5800 g | 4800 g Best | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
Performance
Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
X4 BRICK (65MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) or X4 BRICK (65MH/s)?
Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2.61 GH/s compared to X4 BRICK (65MH/s)'s 65 MH/s.
Is Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) more efficient than X4 BRICK (65MH/s)?
X4 BRICK (65MH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.46 J/MH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.