Option 1

Option 2

Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Dayun | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | Zig | T9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 2.61 GH/s | 12.5 TH/s Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 784W Best | 1576W | Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 300.27 J/GH | 126.08 J/TH Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 18.8 kWh Best | 37.8 kWh | Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.98 Best | -$1.90 | Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$29.55 Best | -$56.98 | Zig M1 (2.61GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 140 x 300 x 170 mm | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5800 g | 3800 g Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 12.5 TH/s compared to Zig M1 (2.61GH/s)'s 2.61 GH/s.
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 126.08 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.