Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L9 (17GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | WhatsMiner | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | M73 | L9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 468 TH/s Best | 17 GH/s | WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 7200W | 3570W Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 15.38 J/TH Best | 210.00 J/GH | WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 172.8 kWh | 85.7 kWh Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $5.60 Best | $1.87 | WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $168.06 Best | $56.08 | WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) |
| Price | $4,473.99 | $3,152.70 Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Estimated ROI | 26 mo Best | 55 mo | WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) |
| Cooling | HYDRO | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 483 x 86 x 663 mm | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 29500 g | 17000 g Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 468 TH/s compared to Antminer L9 (17GH/s)'s 17 GH/s.
Yes, WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) is more energy efficient at 15.38 J/TH.
WhatsMiner M73 (468TH/s) has the stronger estimated payback period at 26 mo, based on current product pricing and $0.060/kWh hosted electricity.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.