Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

WhatsMiner M60 (172MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Gamma Turbo (2.4TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | WhatsMiner M60 (172MH/s) | Gamma Turbo (2.4TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Bitaxe | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | Gamma | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 172 MH/s | 2.4 TH/s Best | Gamma Turbo (2.4TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 35W | WhatsMiner M60 (172MH/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 14.58 J/TH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 0.8 kWh | WhatsMiner M60 (172MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $6.13 Best | $0.02 | WhatsMiner M60 (172MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $183.93 Best | $0.59 | WhatsMiner M60 (172MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 430 x 226 x 155 mm | 120 x 10 x 60 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 13500 g | N/A | Contextual |
Gamma Turbo (2.4TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Gamma Turbo (2.4TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2.4 TH/s compared to WhatsMiner M60 (172MH/s)'s 172 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.