Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer KS7 (45TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M50S (126TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M50S (126TH/s) | Antminer KS7 (45TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | M50 | KS7 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 126 TH/s Best | 45 TH/s | Whatsminer M50S (126TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3276W | 3080W Best | Antminer KS7 (45TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 26.00 J/TH Best | 68.44 J/TH | Whatsminer M50S (126TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 78.6 kWh | 73.9 kWh Best | Antminer KS7 (45TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.29 | $3.48 Best | Antminer KS7 (45TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$8.62 | $104.54 Best | Antminer KS7 (45TH/s) |
| Price | $652.91 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 425 x 225 mm | 430 x 290 x 196 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 16400 g | Contextual |
Whatsminer M50S (126TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Whatsminer M50S (126TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M50S (126TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 126 TH/s compared to Antminer KS7 (45TH/s)'s 45 TH/s.
Yes, Whatsminer M50S (126TH/s) is more energy efficient at 26.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.