ASIC miner comparison

STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s) vs X4-Q (1.04GH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s)
VS
X4-Q (1.04GH/s)
Higher hashrate
STU
Better efficiency
STU
Estimated net daily
STU
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s)

Ask availability
STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
12.8 TH/s
Net daily
$53.82
Open product page

Option 2

X4-Q (1.04GH/s)

Ask availability
X4-Q (1.04GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
1.04 GH/s
Net daily
-$0.19
Open product page

STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s) leads this comparison

STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. X4-Q (1.04GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

STU
5
metric wins
XA
2
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureSTU-U1+ (12.8TH/s)X4-Q (1.04GH/s)Advantage
Brand
StrongU
Jasminer
Contextual
Model
STU
XA
Contextual
Hashrate
12.8 TH/s
Best
1.04 GH/s
STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s)
Power Consumption
1850W
480W
Best
X4-Q (1.04GH/s)
Efficiency
144.53 J/TH
Best
461.54 J/GH
STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s)
Daily energy use
44.4 kWh
11.5 kWh
Best
X4-Q (1.04GH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
$53.82
Best
-$0.19
STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
$1,614.48
Best
-$5.74
STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
130 x 348 x 210 mm
134 x 482 x 360 mm
Contextual
Weight
6600 g
Best
10000 g
STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s)

Performance

STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s) or X4-Q (1.04GH/s)?

STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 12.8 TH/s compared to X4-Q (1.04GH/s)'s 1.04 GH/s.

Is STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s) more efficient than X4-Q (1.04GH/s)?

Yes, STU-U1+ (12.8TH/s) is more energy efficient at 144.53 J/TH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.