Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Option 1
Option 2

Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) | Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Innosilicon | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | S11 | T9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 4.3 TH/s | 10.5 TH/s Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1350W Best | 1432W | S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 313.95 J/TH | 136.38 J/TH Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 32.4 kWh Best | 34.4 kWh | S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$21.82 | -$1.72 Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$654.50 | -$51.66 Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 130 x 290 x 155 mm | 125 x 320 x 190 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 3700 g Best | 4200 g | S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) |
Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 10.5 TH/s compared to S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s)'s 4.3 TH/s.
Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 136.38 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.