Option 1

Option 2

L2 (1.2GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L9 (17GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | L2 (1.2GH/s) | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | L | L9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 1.2 GH/s | 17 GH/s Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 230W Best | 3570W | L2 (1.2GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 191.67 J/GH Best | 210.00 J/GH | L2 (1.2GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 5.5 kWh Best | 85.7 kWh | L2 (1.2GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.19 | $1.47 Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $5.66 | $44.08 Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Price | $376.29 Best | $3,152.70 | L2 (1.2GH/s) |
| Estimated ROI | 65 mo Best | 70 mo | L2 (1.2GH/s) |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 320 x 160 x 160 mm | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 17000 g | Contextual |
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
L2 (1.2GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 17 GH/s compared to L2 (1.2GH/s)'s 1.2 GH/s.
Yes, L2 (1.2GH/s) is more energy efficient at 191.67 J/GH.
L2 (1.2GH/s) has the stronger estimated payback period at 65 mo, based on current product pricing and $0.060/kWh hosted electricity.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.