Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S9 (12.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s) | Antminer S9 (12.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Hammer Miner | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | Scrypt | S9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 105 MH/s | 12.5 TH/s Best | Antminer S9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 25W Best | 1225W | Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 0.24 J/MH Best | 98.00 J/TH | Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 0.6 kWh Best | 29.4 kWh | Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.01 Best | -$1.34 | Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.42 Best | -$40.32 | Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 4200 g | Contextual |
Antminer S9 (12.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S9 (12.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 12.5 TH/s compared to Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s)'s 105 MH/s.
Yes, Hammer Miner Scrypt (105MH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.24 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.