Option 1

Option 2

Antminer L9 (17GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. EPU XC (4.25GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | EPU XC (4.25GH/s) | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | ForestMiner | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | EPU | L9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 4.25 GH/s | 17 GH/s Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3315W Best | 3570W | EPU XC (4.25GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 780.00 J/GH | 210.00 J/GH Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 79.6 kWh Best | 85.7 kWh | EPU XC (4.25GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.71 | $1.47 Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$81.41 | $44.08 Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $3,152.70 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 70 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 612 x 139 x 360 mm | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 28400 g | 17000 g Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 17 GH/s compared to EPU XC (4.25GH/s)'s 4.25 GH/s.
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) is more energy efficient at 210.00 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.