Option 1

Option 2

BK-B (160GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. WhatsMiner M56S (212TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | BK-B (160GH/s) | WhatsMiner M56S (212TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Baikal | MicroBT | Contextual |
| Model | BK | M56 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 160 GH/s | 212 TH/s Best | WhatsMiner M56S (212TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 410W Best | 5550W | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 2.56 J/GH Best | 26.18 J/TH | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 9.8 kWh Best | 133.2 kWh | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.65 Best | -$1.95 | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $19.49 Best | -$58.56 | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | IMMERSION | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 312 x 130 mm | 267 x 401 x 147 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 3800 g Best | 13000 g | BK-B (160GH/s) |
WhatsMiner M56S (212TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
BK-B (160GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
WhatsMiner M56S (212TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 212 TH/s compared to BK-B (160GH/s)'s 160 GH/s.
Yes, BK-B (160GH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.56 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.