Option 1
B2 (24TH/s)
Option 2
Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s)
Balanced match
B2 (24TH/s) and Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | B2 (24TH/s) | Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | GMO miner | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | B2 | Z15 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 24 TH/s Best | 840 KH/s | B2 (24TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1950W Best | 2780W | B2 (24TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 81.25 J/TH | 3.31 J/KH Best | Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 46.8 kWh Best | 66.7 kWh | B2 (24TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.05 | $20.82 Best | Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$61.44 | $624.50 Best | Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $4,576.50 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 7.2 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 245 x 290 x 132 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 18000 g | Contextual |
Performance
B2 (24TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: B2 (24TH/s) or Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s)?
B2 (24TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 24 TH/s compared to Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s)'s 840 KH/s.
Is B2 (24TH/s) more efficient than Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s)?
Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) is more energy efficient at 3.31 J/KH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.