Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Avalon Q (90TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. BM-K1 Max (32TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Avalon Q (90TH/s) | BM-K1 Max (32TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Avalon | iBeLink | Contextual |
| Model | Q | BM-K1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 90 TH/s Best | 32 TH/s | Avalon Q (90TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1674W Best | 3200W | Avalon Q (90TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 18.60 J/TH Best | 100.00 J/TH | Avalon Q (90TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 40.2 kWh Best | 76.8 kWh | Avalon Q (90TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.06 Best | -$4.06 | Avalon Q (90TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $1.78 Best | -$121.74 | Avalon Q (90TH/s) |
| Price | $1,362.78 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 753 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 455 x 440 x 130 mm | 128 x 402 x 201 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 10500 g | 9000 g Best | BM-K1 Max (32TH/s) |
Avalon Q (90TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Avalon Q (90TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Avalon Q (90TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 90 TH/s compared to BM-K1 Max (32TH/s)'s 32 TH/s.
Yes, Avalon Q (90TH/s) is more energy efficient at 18.60 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.