Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S17+ (73TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) | Antminer S17+ (73TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | AvalonMiner | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | A13 | S17 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 130 TH/s Best | 73 TH/s | Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3250W | 2920W Best | Antminer S17+ (73TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 25.00 J/TH Best | 40.00 J/TH | Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 78.0 kWh | 70.1 kWh Best | Antminer S17+ (73TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.04 Best | -$1.40 | Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$1.20 Best | -$42.14 | Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 192 x 292 x 297 mm | 175 x 304 x 298 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 11000 g | Contextual |
Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 130 TH/s compared to Antminer S17+ (73TH/s)'s 73 TH/s.
Yes, Avalon Made A1366 (130TH/s) is more energy efficient at 25.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.