Option 1

Option 2

Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. B1L (60TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) | B1L (60TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | iPollo | Contextual |
| Model | Z9 | B1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 42 KH/s | 60 TH/s Best | B1L (60TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 970W Best | 3000W | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 23.10 J/KH Best | 50.00 J/TH | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 23.3 kWh Best | 72.0 kWh | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.17 Best | -$2.51 | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$5.00 Best | -$75.30 | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 132 x 279 x 226 mm | 306 x 290 x 194 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4700 g Best | 12700 g | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
B1L (60TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
B1L (60TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 60 TH/s compared to Antminer Z9 (42KH/s)'s 42 KH/s.
Yes, Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) is more energy efficient at 23.10 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.