Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Option 1

Option 2
A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer Z15 Pro (860KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z15 Pro (860KH/s) | A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Innosilicon | Contextual |
| Model | Z15 | A4+ | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 860 KH/s | 620 MH/s Best | A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2780W | 750W Best | A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 3.23 J/KH | 1.21 J/MH Best | A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 66.7 kWh | 18.0 kWh Best | A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $26.24 Best | -$0.84 | Antminer Z15 Pro (860KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $787.10 Best | -$25.20 | Antminer Z15 Pro (860KH/s) |
| Price | $4,068.00 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 5.1 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 245 x 290 x 132 mm | 125 x 350 x 155 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 18000 g | 3830 g Best | A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) |
A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 620 MH/s compared to Antminer Z15 Pro (860KH/s)'s 860 KH/s.
A4+ LTCMaster (620MH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.21 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.