Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Option 1

Option 2
Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) | S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Innosilicon | Contextual |
| Model | T9 | S11 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 11.5 TH/s Best | 4.3 TH/s | Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1450W | 1350W Best | S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 126.09 J/TH Best | 313.95 J/TH | Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 34.8 kWh | 32.4 kWh Best | S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.65 Best | -$22.13 | Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$49.44 Best | -$663.78 | Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | 130 x 290 x 155 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 3800 g | 3700 g Best | S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s) |
Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 11.5 TH/s compared to S11 SiaMaster (4.3TH/s)'s 4.3 TH/s.
Yes, Antminer T9 (11.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 126.09 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.