Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S9 (13TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. AE Max II (540MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S9 (13TH/s) | AE Max II (540MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Goldshell | Contextual |
| Model | S9 | AE Max | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 13 TH/s Best | 540 MH/s | Antminer S9 (13TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1300W Best | 3200W | Antminer S9 (13TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 100.00 J/TH | 5.93 J/MH Best | AE Max II (540MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 31.2 kWh Best | 76.8 kWh | Antminer S9 (13TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.43 | $39.97 Best | AE Max II (540MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$42.96 | $1,199.16 Best | AE Max II (540MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $1,047.51 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | <1 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | 264 x 290 x 200 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4200 g Best | 12450 g | Antminer S9 (13TH/s) |
Antminer S9 (13TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
AE Max II (540MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S9 (13TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 13 TH/s compared to AE Max II (540MH/s)'s 540 MH/s.
AE Max II (540MH/s) is more energy efficient at 5.93 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.