Option 1

Option 2

KS5L (12TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L7 (9.16GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L7 (9.16GH/s) | KS5L (12TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | IceRiver | Contextual |
| Model | L7 | KS5 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 9.16 GH/s | 12 TH/s Best | KS5L (12TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3425W | 3400W Best | KS5L (12TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 373.91 J/GH | 283.33 J/TH Best | KS5L (12TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 82.2 kWh | 81.6 kWh Best | KS5L (12TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.25 Best | -$2.81 | Antminer L7 (9.16GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$7.56 Best | -$84.18 | Antminer L7 (9.16GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 370 x 290 mm | 370 x 290 x 198 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 15000 g | 15000 g | Tie |
KS5L (12TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
KS5L (12TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
KS5L (12TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 12 TH/s compared to Antminer L7 (9.16GH/s)'s 9.16 GH/s.
KS5L (12TH/s) is more energy efficient at 283.33 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.