Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Option 1

Option 2
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. A6 LTCMaster (1.23GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | A6 LTCMaster (1.23GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Innosilicon | Contextual |
| Model | K7 | A6 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 63.5 TH/s Best | 1.23 GH/s | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3080W | 1500W Best | A6 LTCMaster (1.23GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 48.50 J/TH Best | 1219.51 J/GH | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 73.9 kWh | 36.0 kWh Best | A6 LTCMaster (1.23GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.94 Best | -$1.62 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$28.06 Best | -$48.60 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Price | $1,727.88 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 350 x 500 x 155 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 7550 g | Contextual |
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 63.5 TH/s compared to A6 LTCMaster (1.23GH/s)'s 1.23 GH/s.
Yes, Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 48.50 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.