Option 1

Option 2

Antminer B7 (96KH/s) and Antminer L9 (17GH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer B7 (96KH/s) | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | B7 | L9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 96 KH/s | 17 GH/s Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 528W Best | 3570W | Antminer B7 (96KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 5.50 J/KH Best | 210.00 J/GH | Antminer B7 (96KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 12.7 kWh Best | 85.7 kWh | Antminer B7 (96KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.76 | $2.02 Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$22.81 | $60.58 Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $3,152.70 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 51 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 130 x 244 x 155 mm | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 17000 g | Contextual |
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer B7 (96KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 17 GH/s compared to Antminer B7 (96KH/s)'s 96 KH/s.
Yes, Antminer B7 (96KH/s) is more energy efficient at 5.50 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.