Option 1

Option 2

Antminer A3 (815GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer T17 (40TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) | Antminer T17 (40TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | A3 | T17 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 815 GH/s | 40 TH/s Best | Antminer T17 (40TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1275W Best | 2200W | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.56 J/GH Best | 55.00 J/TH | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 30.6 kWh Best | 52.8 kWh | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.66 Best | -$1.95 | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$49.68 Best | -$58.44 | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 321 x 208 mm | 298 x 296 x 178 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4200 g Best | 11500 g | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
Antminer T17 (40TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer A3 (815GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer T17 (40TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 40 TH/s compared to Antminer A3 (815GH/s)'s 815 GH/s.
Yes, Antminer A3 (815GH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.56 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.