Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

AL-BOX II (720KH/s) and Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | AL-BOX II (720KH/s) | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | E11 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 720 KH/s | 9.5 GH/s Best | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 2470W | AL-BOX II (720KH/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 260.00 J/GH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 59.3 kWh | AL-BOX II (720KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $1.30 Best | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $39.10 Best | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 198 x 96 x 150 mm | 400 x 290 x 195 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 2200 g Best | 14200 g | AL-BOX II (720KH/s) |
Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 9.5 GH/s compared to AL-BOX II (720KH/s)'s 720 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.